I have a comment on the NYT Room to Debate forum Google or China: Who Has More to Lose? praising Google's decision not to censor search results on .cn but recognizing that it was the alleged Chinese government's hacking that broke the camel's back as opposed to general disgust with the regime's Internet Freedom policy (I also wrote about this at the time of the initial announcement in January). I do think it shows that while doing business with China could be justified by a goal of fostering engagement, collaborating with the regime cannot.
« Why invest in privacy? | Main
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Welcome
Recent and Upcoming Presentations
- 2/23: What's Hot in Copyright
for Virtual Worlds
and User Generated Content
Copyright Society of Northern California - 2/24: Privacy, Free Speech, and
‘Blurry-Edged’ Social Networks
The Community Roundtable - 3/17: Can Publishers Take Ownership of Privacy? OMMA Global, SF
- 4/11: Technologic Change And The Courts Northern District of California Judicial Conference
- 1/7: Social Media and Social Norms American Association of Law Schools
Swich to wordpress, make your blogger nicer. -My 2 cents
Posted by: best remote control helicopter | 12/07/2011 at 09:22 AM